Copyright 1988-1994. The Johns Hopkins University Press. All rights reserved.
Mr. Lee. The Danger to liberty greater from the disunited opinions and jarring Plans of many, than from the energetic operations of one, Marius, Sylla, Caesar, Cromwell trampled on Liberty with Armies.
The Power of Pardon— of adjourning the Legislature.
Power of Revision, Sufficient to defend himself. he would be Supported by the People.
Patronage. gives great Influence. The Interference more nominal than real.
The greater Part of Power of making Treaties in the President.
The greatest Power is in the President. the less in the Senate.
cannot see Responsibility, in the President or the great officers of State.
a masqued Battery of constructive Powers would compleat the destruction of Liberty.
Can the Executive lay Embargoes, establish Fairs, Tolls & c.?
The foederal Government is limited. the Legislative Power of it is limited, and therefore the Executive and judicial must be limited.
The Executive not punishable but by universal Convulsion, as Charles 1st.
The Legislative in England not so corrupt as the Executive.
There is no Responsibility, in the President, or Ministry.
Blackstone. the Liberties of England owing to Juries. The greatness of England owing to the genius of that People.
The Crown of England can do what it pleases, nearly.
There is no ballance in America, to such an Executive as that in England.
does the Executive Arm, mean a standing Army?
Willing to make a Law, that the President, if he sees gross misconduct may Suspend pro tempore.
laments that We are obliged to discuss this question. of great Importance and much difficulty.
The Executive co extensive with the Legislative. had the Clause Stood alone, would not there have been a devolution of all Executive Power? Exceptions are to be construed strictly. This is an invariable Rule.
The President has not a continental Interest, but is a Citizen of a particular State. a King. of England. otherwise. King of England counteracted by a large powerful rich and hereditary aristocracy. Hyperion to a satyr.[1
] Whenever there are not intermediate Powers, an alteration of the Government must be to despotism.
Powers ought not to be inconsiderately given to the Executive, without proper ballances.
triennial and septenial Parliaments made by Corruption of the Executive.
Bowstring. General Lally. Brutus's Power to put his sons to death.[2
The Power creating shall have that of uncreating. The Minister is to hold at Pleasure of the appointor.
if it is in the Constitution, why insert it, in the Law? brought in by a Sidewind, inferentially.
There will be every endeavour to increase the consolidatory Powers. to weaken the Senate, and Strengthen the President.
No Evil in the Senates participating with the President in Removal.
President is to take care that the Laws be faithfully executed. he is responsible. how can he do his duty or be responsible, if he cannot remove his Instruments.
it is not an equal sharing of the Power of Appointment between the President & senate.
The Senate are only a check to prevent Impositions of the President.
The Minister an Agent a Deputy to the great Executive.
difficult to bring great Character to Punishment or Tryal.
Power of Suspension.
Mr. Johnson. Gentlemen convince themselves that it is best the President Should have the Power, and then Study for Arguments.
Not a Grant. Vested in the President, would be void for Uncertainty. Executive Power is uncertain. Powers are moral, mechanical natural. which of these Powers. what Executive Power? The Land— The Money. conveys nothing. what Land? what Money.
Unumquoque dissolvitur, eodem modo, quo ligatur.[3
meddles not with the question of Expediency.
The Executive wants Power, by its duration and its want of a Negative, & Power to ballance.
. What is the difference between a Grant and a Partition.
Mr. Izard. Cujus est instituere ejus abrogare.[4
Documentary History of the First Federal Congress of the United States of America,
ed. Charlene Bickford, et al.
(Columbia, S.C.: Model Editions Partnership, 1999).
Electronic version based on the
Documentary History of the First Federal Congress of the United States of America
(Baltimore, Md.: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1988) Vol. 9, pp. 104-117; 134-135; 445-449; 465-467; 483-489. On the Web at http://mep.blackmesatech.com/mep/ [Accessed 30 October 2017]